Predicting the Progress to Measure the Success of Working Code

 

Requirement changes come to customers often do not know what they really want until they see a demonstration of programme in action and primavera seeks to acquire customer feedback on what they really need as early as possible. The process is therefore to design a small portion of the programme show it to the customer, who then gives feedback and the features that presented to the customer do not necessarily have to be field ready. Just demonstration ready seeing the product in action provides the customer insight as they can communicate in updated requirements. Wanting to begin the primavera p6 programme development focusing on the most important functions of the system that tends to coincide with a customer’s knowledge of the system. The importance to know with the customer are generally the key aspects of the system to begin with the features thinks is the most important helping to develop. The team targets the most important system functions for primavera approaches divergence from the common project management in the method to complete all requirements for the whole system. 

Doing all the design code to the whole system of primavera p6 programme test every feature is done all together in phases and the entrance requirement of a successor phase is the completion of all features in a predecessor phase. As work progresses to all work for a stage finishes before the next begins in the project management approach to all features enter in and out of each phase together. No feature is completed until the end of the project is validation of all features deferred until the project’s last phase, the primavera does not measure progress in phases on working code or features is its measure. As the principle encourage to deliver the working primavera p6 programme frequently the project status is reflected in the amount of code demonstrably working. The big difference in the management of programme projects method is that features are built one at a time and not at the same time. Each feature proceeds through all phases of analyzing designed to code testing and possibly deployment once the feature completes all stages then turn to the next feature. 

Validation of features is done frequently believed that by individually coding each feature through all stages of product development problems will manifest in primavera p6 programme with normal planned to take development feature for customer verification. Featured problems are found after of work in verses that possibly months with the waterfall approach to the primavera management of programme projects in a way like managing a mini lifecycle for each individual feature. In each iteration of primavera delivers smaller and more important features through the primavera p6 programme development pipeline that provides earlier feedback of functionality. The single feature iteration time through the development pipeline is significantly less than the time required to bring all features through when the system is taken as a whole. It embraces the requirement changes which are updated at the end of each feature’s project iteration but the scope creep is controlled by either more precise requirements and removing items from the requirements list.